Home ›
The Straight Dope on Broadband in Minnesota
I finally got an opinion piece published in the Star Tribune - In Minnesota, a de facto limit on broadband: Service across the state would be better if there were public competition.
All thoughts and comments appreciated.
Recent comments
- Yeah, in the context of
2 weeks 5 days ago - comparison
2 weeks 5 days ago - Interesting comparison but
2 weeks 5 days ago - It's a slippery slope though
2 weeks 6 days ago - markets
3 weeks 1 day ago - interesting article & comments
3 weeks 1 day ago - MMA
5 weeks 6 days ago - Yup
6 weeks 8 hours ago - Hmmmm
6 weeks 8 hours ago - Pigs is pigs
11 weeks 4 days ago
Recent Tweets
- SportShotChris: I'm #reading The Big Short by Michael Lewis http://t.co/KyI2k3jY
- SportShotChris: RT @elforesto: Komen is still a terrible charity. They regularly bully people with bogus copyright claims. Why would you WANT their co ...
- SportShotChris: RT @stopthecap: HissyFitWatch: ATT's Failed-Merger Tab Will Be Covered by Customers http://t.co/DuAlRBYF

Comments
Nice piece
It strikes me that these two paragraphs are reversed, or at least need to be restructured.
It takes a 65 percent supermajority in a referendum for a community to operate its own network.
Minnesota has one of the oldest obstacles to community networks. As a result of a law passed in 1915, a community must achieve a 65 percent supermajority on a referendum to operate a "telephone exchange." In the modern age, virtually all fiber-optic networks offer "triple-play" services (telephone, broadband and television) to generate the revenues needed to pay the debt of building the network.
Indeed - editing
Thanks - I agree with your comment, which is why I never would have written it that way. You can thank the editors of the Strib for incoherence. I'll soon post my original copy at MuniNetworks.org.
Post new comment